incoherent babble.

you talk about “oppressors” and “oppressed” like they are eternal identities instead of positions (re)produced through state power, property relations, and social hierarchies.

you do not understand the anarchist critique of domination because you do not understand domination structurally. you reduce it to a question of who deserves to dominate, instead of examining the systems that produce domination and subordination in the first place. anarchists oppose domination because we want to dismantle those systems entirely.

if you cannot distinguish between resisting domination and recreating domination, it is because you are operating within a discursive closure that makes that distinction unintelligible. do not mistake it for reality.

if you imagine liberation as finally getting your turn to wear the jailer’s uniform, then we are indeed enemies.