Interesting take. I don’t know his work very well other than “The Ruthless Elimination of Hurry,” and I didn’t find that too problematic. But it’s also the kind of book that doesn’t require a strong theological foundation in order to follow the arguments or agree to the conclusions.

I think your approach makes a lot of sense—if someone’s reading Comer, their foot’s in the door and the invitation to read Luther et al may be well-received.