While this analysis is grounded in historical patterns and existing legal frameworks, the proposed scenario remains speculative based on current geopolitical signals and elite behavior.

There’s a historical pattern of elites weaponizing both communism and Islam to dismantle Christian and Western civilization. Time and again, they’ve aligned these forces to attack biblical values and erase cultural heritage. So it’s no surprise that the United Nations consistently sides with Islam and Marxist forces—it’s a predictable move in a long-established strategy.

Remember: BRICS+ is the new cosmetic front for accelerating the globalist order and ushering in a serf class for all. The goal is to collapse free societies and the West, which still retains a foundation of Christian ethics.

The objective is clear: destabilize the West—especially the United States—by fueling global resentment toward both America and Israel. This collapse is essential to usher in the new designated moral authority and New World Order. The elites achieve great gains of destruction by exploiting Islam’s hostility toward Christians—especially Zionists—channeling that conflict into a controlled demolition of the current world system.

About the Bunker Buster Trump Op:

Executive War Powers

Presidents from both parties—especially Obama—have expanded the executive’s war powers, often sidestepping congressional authority. These actions reflect a steady erosion of constitutional checks and align with longstanding concerns about the bypassing of national sovereignty in favor of globalist objectives.

President Barack Obama repeatedly authorized military strikes and interventions without explicit congressional approval, setting precedents that expanded executive war powers.

• Libya (2011): Obama ordered military intervention without seeking congressional authorization, claiming the operation didn’t fall under the War Powers Resolution. U.S. forces remained engaged for about eight months.

• Syria and Iraq (2014): Airstrikes against ISIS were launched without congressional approval. The administration justified them through periodic 60-day notifications, effectively bypassing the spirit of the War Powers Act.

War Powers Workaround: Exploiting post-9/11 legal shifts, Obama—and presidents since—have relied on vague justifications like the 2001 AUMF to carry out operations never intended to be unilateral under the Constitution.

The United Nations Framework: This isn’t just about domestic overreach. The United Nations Participation Act of 1945—still in effect—states that the president “shall not be deemed to require the authorization of Congress” to deploy U.S. forces in support of UN Security Council resolutions. In other words, American military power was subordinated to international governance long before the post-9/11 expansions.

This Act remains a legal cornerstone of postwar globalism, enabling presidents to sidestep Congress under the banner of “international responsibility” and “global security cooperation.” The system—backed by financial giants like Blackstone and BlackRock—has already embedded the mechanisms needed to override national sovereignty.

Their agenda? Perhaps to install their latest technocratic puppet in Iran, namely, the exiled crown prince—while expanding global control. 

Geopolitical flashpoints: Iran’s threats to close the Strait of Hormuz are well-documented (e.g., 2012, 2019), and such a move would instantly spike oil prices, disrupt global trade, and potentially provoke U.S. or NATO response. This chokepoint remains a strategic vulnerability the elites could exploit to justify broader conflict.

The energy angle: An oil shock from a Hormuz closure could serve as the catalyst to accelerate the transition to alternative energy, especially as public skepticism around “climate reparations” grows. A forced pivot away from fossil fuels under the pressure of crisis would align with long-term globalist environmental objectives, even as they abandon traditional climate rhetoric.

The elites know the climate change narrative has lost traction. 

But a global energy shock wrapped in chaos, war, and “international necessity” still has the power to move the needle.