Is there a Climate Emergency? 1992 Scientists declare, "There is no climate emergency" Of course there isn't. But you need numbers to go up against the IPPC, which was designed by Maurice Strong to always find a climate emergency. By Dr. Meryl Nass (06/28/25, last updated 07/08/25)

* It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts

merylnass.substack.com/…

• World Climate Declaration. THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY. PDF with 1992 SIGNATORIES (65 pages, mostly signatories from around the world): tinyurl.com/y96m9aku

• Sign the declaration (if you are a climate scientist): tinyurl.com/4y2ncfyf

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today's climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models? — World Climate Declaration

"He who controls the weather will control the world." — Lyndon Baines Johnson tinyurl.com/35snd45s

Text of the declaration is below.

__________

There is no climate emergency

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures

Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Warming is far slower than predicted

The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases, they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters

There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.

OUR ADVICE TO THE WORLD LEADERS IS THAT SCIENCE SHOULD STRIVE FOR A SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, WHILE POLITICS SHOULD FOCUS ON MINIMIZING POTENTIAL CLIMATE DAMAGE BY PRIORITIZING ADAPTATION STRATEGIES BASED ON PROVEN AND AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES.

__________

Our Two-Cents Worth

Link: tinyurl.com/339zfkk9

The climate change narrative is a way to gain total control over world population, transfer great gobs of money to the “elite,” and allow many forms of harmful weather engineering to continue unchecked. 

Climate and weather have ebbed and flowed naturally for millennia, without human interference and not much impact. 

We’ve only fake modeled, measured, and cherry picked data during a tiny timeframe geologically speaking. 

There’s no telling just how devastating globalist climate management activities will be for humans, plants, animals, soil, air, and water over future millennia.
_____
Comment: The Problem is we have been conditioned to believe what "they" say. As long as the population accepts the false narratives propagated by academia and the media, we won't make progress as a society.

Response: You're right, of course. But it's our job to expose the "they" and their lies. Time to spread information, boldly and truthfully.

If we shut up, they win. We must move the Overton Window and open the minds of the 20-40% who still have minds and are willing to use them.

Related:

• Maurice Strong: tinyurl.com/398ybh8j

  ED NOTE: We could not figure out Dr. Nass’s reference to IPPC since similar organizations use that acronym

• Cloud Seeding Experiment in Idaho: tinyurl.com/5ddchbuy

• 🔥CALL TO ACTION: ICAN Challenges British Government’s Geoengineering Experiments to Dim the Sun: tinyurl.com/yhfacc3e

• 🔥SIGN OPEN LETTER: We call for an International Non-Use Agreement on Solar Geoengineering: tinyurl.com/59bt2sjj

• 🔥SIGN WEATHER ENGINEERING PETITION - Ban Weather Engineering in Idaho: tinyurl.com/yv5hmnfa

• 🆕 Flaws in 150 Years of Global Temperature Data Blow Holes in Global Warming Narrative: tinyurl.com/bdh3zm6f

• 🆕 MTG Introduces Bill Making Weather Modification a Felony in Bold Push Against Geoengineering: tinyurl.com/4rwk4rx3

• 🆕 Clear Skies Movement - USA on X: tinyurl.com/mtpbsee9

• 🆕 Confirmed: CEO of Weather Modification Company Reveals Cloud Seeding Operations Were Conducted in Texas Just Two Days Before Deadly Flood (VIDEO). By Anthony Scott (07/08/25): tinyurl.com/245t7s6n

• 🆕 Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (August 1996 military report; see scenario on page 9): tinyurl.com/28bkjpac