Make money doing the work you believe in
Flaws in 150 Years of Global Temperature Data Blow Holes in Global Warming Narrative. By Antonio Graceffo (07/06/25)
"He who controls the weather will control the world." — Lyndon Baines Johnson tinyurl.com/35snd45s
Garbage data in, garbage conclusions and policy out. If weather measurements — or computer models — are faulty or manipulated, conclusions will be as well.
📌 Should we be upending everyone’s lives using bad data that generally leads to bad policy?
📌 What harms occur when we attempt to fit outcomes to faulty input numbers — especially in systems as complex and poorly understood as climate or human and animal biology?
📌 Where else have we seen this tendency for human “experts” to dominate nature?
Mass vaccinations based on induced antibody levels that don’t necessarily provide resistance to or prevent disease.
Mass prescription of statins based on perceived need to force cholesterol numbers within a desired range — which often changes to match the newest drug being marketed.
Mass prescription of blood pressure medication to reduce blood pressure to levels that can put seniors in danger of life-threatening falls.
Just to name a few examples, all of which have known and dangerous side effects!
Graceffo’s article discusses manipulated weather station data being used to adjudicate “global climate change” and justify open-air experimentation with weather engineering along with draconian “net zero” carbon policies.
SUMMARY (Grok ai, edited; image from article)
Antonio Graceffo critiques the reliability of global temperature data used to support claims of a 1.1°C to 1.3°C rise since the pre-industrial era.
He highlights flaws in measurement practices, including non-compliant weather stations, urban heat island effects, and transitions from mercury thermometers to digital sensors.
These issues, combined with geographic biases in early records and subjective data adjustments, introduce errors that may exceed the reported climate signals, undermining the precision of the global warming narrative and the policies based on it.
Key Issues with Temperature Data
Non-Compliant Weather Stations
96% of U.S. temperature stations fail NOAA’s siting standards.
Many are placed near heat sources including air conditioners, asphalt, or buildings. [ED: Remember when kids put thermometers or their foreheads under a heating pad to feign a fever and avoid school?]
Properly sited stations show warming rates reduced by nearly half.
Urban Heat Island Effect
Urban development around stations causes artificial warming (2–5°F higher than nearby rural areas).
Concrete and human activity absorb and radiate heat, skewing readings.
Trends may reflect urban growth, not global climate change.
Measurement Technology Transition
Shift from mercury thermometers to digital sensors in the 1980s–2000s skews data.
Digital data collection systems are more accurate but create inconsistencies with older data.
Global adoption of digital sensors was uneven, complicating comparisons.
Geographic Bias in Early Records
Pre-1950s data mainly from Europe and North America.
Sparse coverage of oceans (71% of Earth), polar regions, Africa, and Asia.
Global averages extrapolated from limited regional data are unreliable.
Data Adjustments and Homogenization
Raw data is “corrected” through subjective homogenization processes. [ED: That is, they lather, rinse, and repeat until the numbers match the desired results.}
Different methods yield varying trends, introducing bias.
Adjustments are often as large as the climate signals being studied.
Critical Analysis
Measurement errors (±0.5°C) may exceed reported warming trends.
Stanford researcher Patrick Frank suggests temperature changes are statistically insignificant.
Socioeconomic factors, like economic growth, correlate with warming trends, indicating non-climatic influences.
Flawed data undermines the precision needed for costly climate policies.
Related:
MTG Introduces Bill Making Weather Modification a Felony in Bold Push Against Geoengineering: tinyurl.com/zr5jebke
Is there a Climate Emergency? 1992 Scientists declare, "There is no climate emergency": tinyurl.com/mumtsczu
Cloud Seeding Experiment in Idaho: tinyurl.com/5ddchbuy
Clear Skies Movement - USA on X: tinyurl.com/mtpbsee9
Confirmed: CEO of Weather Modification Company Reveals Cloud Seeding Operations Were Conducted in Texas Just Two Days Before Deadly Flood (VIDEO). By Anthony Scott (07/08/25): tinyurl.com/245t7s6n
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (August 1996 military report; see scenario on page 9): tinyurl.com/28bkjpac
