The app for independent voices

Big E's avatar
Big E
Feb 16
Big E’s Big Mouth Substack

Idaho Legislature – VOTE YES on H0602 - Idaho courts, foreign law (Posted: 02/16/26)

Summary (ai assisted)

Grok analysis link: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…

H602 establishes public policy against applying foreign laws that violate fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. or Idaho Constitutions, including (but not limited to) due process, freedom of religion, speech, press, privacy, or marriage; it declares such rulings, contracts, or jurisdictions void and unenforceable, with applicability exceptions. (No fiscal impact. No contradictions identified with US Constitution or Idaho Constitution.)

Definitions

  • Court: Any state court, board, tribunal, arbitration, administrative agency, or other adjudicative/enforcement authority.

  • Foreign law: Law, code, or system from jurisdictions outside U.S. states/territories, including international organizations/tribunals; excludes Idaho Indian tribes' laws and English common law.

  • Religious organization: Church, seminary, synagogue, temple, mosque, religious order, corporation, association, or society with distinctive religious identity, including those under IRC 501(c)(3) or 501(d).

NOTE: This bill includes much legalese that we don’t presume to understand. We’ve done our best to summarize below.

“Similar fundamental rights”: The summary below references “similar fundamental rights.” These are fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed under the constitutions of the United States and Idaho, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech, or the press, and any right of privacy or marriage embodied in the constitution of the state of Idaho

Use of Foreign Laws – Unenforceability: Court rulings/decisions based on foreign laws not granting similar fundamental rights are void and unenforceable.

Choice of Law: Contractual provisions choosing foreign laws that violate public policy by not granting similar fundamental rights are void and unenforceable.

Jurisdiction: Contractual provisions granting jurisdiction incorporating foreign laws not guaranteeing similar fundamental rights violate public policy and are void/unenforceable.

Forum Non Conveniens: Claims of forum non conveniens* are denied if they would likely violate nonclaimant's fundamental rights in the foreign forum.

* Forum non conveniens: (Latin for 'an inconvenient forum') is a mostly common law legal doctrine through which a court dismisses a case, acknowledging that another forum or court is a more appropriate venue for the case. – Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F…

Applicability

  • Does not apply to corporations, partnerships, LLCs, business associations, or other legal entities contracting to subject themselves to foreign law outside Idaho/U.S.

  • Does not apply to contracts before effective date (July 1, 2026).

  • Does not limit free exercise of religion under U.S. First Amendment or Idaho Constitution Article I, Section 4.

  • Does not require/prohibit courts from adjudicating religious organizations' ecclesiastical matters if it would violate Establishment/Free Exercise Clauses.

Conflict: Does not conflict with valid federal treaties/international agreements preempting or superior to state law.

Reason for Recommendation to VOTE YES

Sharia and other foreign laws whose values are the antithesis of American values have taken over many places in the Middle East and Europe. H0602 can help prevent such takeover by foreign laws, including Sharia, in Idaho and allow only appropriate US Laws to be used.

While H0602 does not explicitly mention Islamic Sharia law, Sharia is a harsh form of foreign law that certainly would qualify (see Related links below).

Some places that embrace and do not embrace Sharia law include the following (Source: Grok tinyurl.com/yshr28xv):

  • Sharia law is embraced by Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia (Aceh), Nigeria (north), Pakistan, and Egypt.

  • Europe allows Sharia law via UK Arbitration Act 1996 for civil disputes; Greece optionally in Thrace since 2018; and Austria court validated Sharia arbitration.

  • In the US, 28+ states have anti-Sharia laws and others are working to prevent such foreign laws from taking over.

H0602’s statement of purpose says it all:

The founders of our nation believed that the United States of America and its individual states should never be subservient to any foreign power, country or legal system and that no foreign power, country or legal system should be allowed to encroach upon our rights under the Constitution.

Foreign laws or foreign legal doctrines can be a means of imposing an agenda on the American people by circumventing US and state constitutions. These foreign laws may not recognize our constitutional rights and liberties in US courts.

The potential impact of using foreign laws and legal doctrines in US courts on the liberty of ordinary American citizens are as profound as they are despairing. The embrace of foreign legal systems, some of which are inherently hostile to our constitutional liberties, is a violation of the principles on which our nation was founded.

This legislation will establish statutory law prohibiting the intrusion of discordant foreign laws or foreign legal doctrines to protect Idaho citizens and preserve constitutional rights and American values of liberty and freedom.

Please VOTE YES on H0602.

Related

Big E’s Big Mouth Substack
Big E’s Big Mouth Substack
Idaho Legislature 2026 Bills to Support or Oppose
Feb 16
at
7:23 PM
Relevant people

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.