Why Was Moderna Allowed to Use A Toxic mRNA Dose? The data that proves Moderna used a deadly dose and the psychopathy that led to the choice to use it. By A Midwestern Doctor (08/04/24)

As always, A Midwestern Doctor (AMD) brings a high level of research and detail combined with an analytical and compassionate approach to explain how Moderna managed to make massive money on a massively dangerous product.

Story at a Glance:

• A major problem with mRNA technology is finding a dose strong enough to elicit the desired effect without being unbearably toxic.

• Moderna’s dose was 3.3X greater than even Pfizer felt was safe enough to use.

• Numerous datasets have shown the Moderna shot is roughly 50% more likely to injure recipients — including deaths, miscarriages, and birth defects.

• Despite these harms, no regulator has compared the basic safety of shots from various manufacturers.

• Steve Kirsch recently acquired a large record-level country-wide dataset from Czechoslovakia on deaths following vaccination, which clearly and unambiguously showed the Moderna shot caused 30% more deaths than Pfizer’s. The study also showed that Pfizer’s shot raised the risk of death by 34% and that both shots had little ability to prevent COVID-19 deaths.

• Moderna’s decision to bring a toxic mRNA dose to market reflected its corrosive culture, which swindled $billions from investors over false promises of mRNA miracles and fired any employee who did not buy into the “mRNA gene therapies are safe and effective” mantra.

• Moderna’s approval and after-market protection go hand in hand with the government's heavy financial investment in Moderna.