Medical Journal Censorship Is The Proximate Cause of the Covid Vaccine Catastrophe. Here I document the brazen censoring behaviors of numerous major medical journals attempting to prop up the "safe and effective" narrative despite mountains of evidence to the contrary. By Pierre Kory, MD, MPA (11/11/24)
Definitions & Background
Scientific consensus: The generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time. ~Wikipedia
Heterodox:
Not in accordance with established or accepted doctrines or opinions, especially in theology; unorthodox. ~Merriam Webster Dictionary
Throughout history, scientific consensus often has been proven wrong and heterodox thinking proven right. Just two classic examples:
Ignaz Semmelweis — Persecuted for his views that hand washing would prevent infection and death: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I… *
Galileo Galilei — Persecuted for stating that the planets revolved around the sun:
ED NOTE
Because medical journals are censored and biased to favor Big Pharma and other interests, your doctors who read them do not know what they do not know.
Additionally, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other medical professionals are trained to accept only “scientific consensus” and discouraged from thinking outside the box. Dr. Kory’s article cites many examples of how “scientific consensus” has been weaponized against heterodox doctors and scientists — especially the massive censoring actions by medical journals on the adverse effects of COVID “vaccines” and the safety and efficacy of re-purposed drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Dr. Kory discusses the work of A Midwestern Doctor, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorp, and many others. He offers examples of valid papers either retracted or never published because medical journals and peer reviewers had massive conflicts of interest.
The key graph in this article (see below) says it all:
The “peer reviewed” published literature suggests that X IS True.
The total evidence — often not allowed to be published or retracted — suggests that X is NOT True.
Bottom Line
So, should you and your doctor believe your own lying eyes, or should you believe peer reviewed literature? One hopes that after reading Dr. Kory’s article and observing what has happened to the medical literature and “scientific consensus” over decades — including the COVID era — you will choose to believe “your own lying eyes!”
Simple steps:
Research beyond the consensus science presented by medical journals, government “experts,” and so-called “health” agencies.
Follow the money: Ask “who benefits” (Cui bono)?
Follow the liability: Ask “who is legally liable”?
Think for yourself.
Insist that all who provide medical services to you and your family do the above.
