Vermont Family Takes Legal Battle to Supreme Court After Six-Year-Old Administered Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine Without Parental Consent at Public School Clinic. By Jim Hoft (11/25/24 - Updated 12/19/24)
Vermont parents Tony and Shujen Politella are appealing to the US Supreme Court after their six-year-old son Leone was injected with an experimental COVID-19 vaccine at a public school clinic without their permission. The Vermont Supreme Court ruled against them.
The Vermont decision means school and other officials can force vaccinate others’ children with complete impunity. This is a state that already provides hormone blockers and birth control to young children without parental consent or knowledge! ~Attorney John Klar
Summary:
Windham Southeast School District in Vermont reassured parents their child would not receive COVID-19 shot without their permission.
The school mixed up an arm tag and jabbed the kid even though he protested that his parents had said NO. (This happened to other children.)
The parents sued the school.
Vermont Supreme Court ruled in favor of federal laws that protect vaccine manufacturers and administrators under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, effectively barring their claims.
The attorneys argue that PREP Act was intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from liability—not allow schools to bypass parental consent.
Vermont public schools were awarded monetary bonuses based on vaccination rates.
The Politellas and their attorneys Ron Ferrara and John Klar are petitioning the US Supreme Court to overturn the Vermont Supreme Court’s ruling that the PREP Act extended to the public school and its staff.
Unfortunately, they may lose due to wording of the PREP Act (although one could legitimately argue that the school engaged in willful misconduct). Excerpt from PREP Act page FAQs below (emphasis is ours):
Liability Immunity and Compensation
In general, the liability immunity applies to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of medical countermeasures described in a Declaration. The only statutory exception to this immunity is for actions or failures to act that constitute willful misconduct.
The Politellas are seeking public support to cover their legal fees (attorneys Ferrara and Klar work pro bono currently): givebutter.com/j1vdDO
Video and Supreme Court petition are included in the article.
Related:
INTERVIEW: VT Supreme Court: Schools can vax against parents’ will. Article (12/19/24, includes video 19:09): standforhealthfreedom.c…
VT Supreme Court: Schools can vax against parents’ will, John Klar | Stand For Health Freeedom (12/17/24, video 19:09): rumble.com/v60cahz-vt-s…
PREP Act: aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREP…
Umbrellas, Community Schools, United Way & School Board Meetings. By Big E Substack (updated as needed):
