The app for independent voices

NY Times, Again, Tries to Normalize Injecting Kids With Neurotoxins. By Jefferey Jaxen (01/26/25)

jeffereyjaxen.substack.…

Jeffery Jaxen explains the harms of the neurotoxin aluminum, which is used to increase inflammation (as a proxy for immunity) and is in 27 jabs given to kids.

Unfortunately, mainstream media, including the New York Times (NYT) states — without scientific evidence — that aluminum adjuvants are perfectly normal and safe for kids.

For example, the NYT headline blared:

Yes, Some Vaccines Contain Aluminum. That’s a Good Thing.

while admitting “…aluminum adjuvants are found in 27 routine vaccines, and nearly half of those recommended for children under 5.”

Unfortunately, NYT is wrong. Jaxen writes:

Aluminum adjuvants are literally toxic to the human body, causing cellular and nerve death…Aluminum adjuvants also cause immune dysregulation, and are used in labs to induce autoimmunity in mice.

When attorneys representing the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) asked NIH and the CDC to produce the studies relied upon to claim injected aluminum is safe, the agencies dragged their feet for more than THREE YEARS, then could not come up with a single study to back their claims.

Where Did NYT Get Its Information?

Well, they’re probably listening to government “experts” and reading their web pages. (They’re also, likely, trying to defeat RFK Jr’s nomination as Secretary of Health & Human Services.)

For example, the CDC’s “Key Points” about adjuvants (cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/…) state:

  • An adjuvant is an ingredient used in some vaccines that helps create a stronger immune response in people receiving the vaccine. In other words, adjuvants help vaccines work better.

  • Adjuvants help the body to produce an immune response strong enough to protect the person from the disease he or she is being vaccinated against.

So, we can’t blame the NYT for having aluminum on the brain. This information comes straight from our CDC and straight for our kids!

In Other News

The Hill (and likely other outlets) continues to use the inaccurate and pejorative term “anti-vax” to neutralize opposition to the scientific fact that vaccines generally have not proven to be safe or effective.

Related:

  • Is Alzheimer’s Linked to Aluminum Exposure:

Jan 27
at
3:19 PM

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.