(Check the linked page or use My Bill Tracker for the bill’s current status.)
_____________________
S1147 adds yet more cost and complexity to existing school funding schemes. Schools should be attaining desired outcomes without incentives – it’s their job! If they fail to do their jobs properly, the schools should be penalized, not given complicated-to-calculate extra funding if they happen to do what they should be doing already.
Notes:
Outcomes-Based Funding component is subject to appropriation and is accounted for in the Governor's FY 2026 K-12 budget at $35 million.
State board of education standards referred to in this bill seem extraordinarily bureaucratic and opaque as a basis for “real world” outcomes.
Details:
"Outcomes-based funding" means funding distributed to local education agencies based on meeting targets in mathematics proficiency and growth in grades 5 through 8 and attainment of the credentials necessary for transition into the workforce or postsecondary education in grades 9 through 12. Such funding shall be aligned with the strategic student achievement goals determined by the state department of education and approved by the state board of education.
Schools can receive financial support based on (very complex calculations, highly simplified below):
(1) mathematics performance, with 60% of funding allocated for math outcomes including student growth and proficiency.
(2) secondary outcomes, with 40% of funding based on graduation rates and students attaining workforce or postsecondary education credentials.
Economically disadvantaged students are weighted more heavily in the calculation.
State legislature must review the outcomes-based funding program in 2030 and every five years thereafter to assess its effectiveness.