Dallas, great work as always. One thing I would recommend looking into before you state that “ActBlue’s involvement is purely financial processing, not direct funding of operations. (As of publication)” is ActBlue’s affiliate company “Action Network” and also ActBlue’s practice of “smurfing.” Action Network is the CRM platform that allows anyone with a credit card to launch a “protest” (or “action”) from anywhere in the world as it provides the means to distribute sign graphics to local print shops, ensure that Lyft or Uber is available to get your rioters, I mean “protestors” to the rally point, and it even allows you to get food to the protest participants via plugins from DoorDash and similar companies. Smurfing is the practice of using the names, addresses, and credit cards of unwitting donors to fund other “causes” that ActBlue is providing fiscal sponsorship for. In this context, should the funds of the “smurfs” be redirected to causes that are directly related to the violent rhetoric of such actions (like the assassination of Charlie Kirk) AND those actions were set up through Action Network, then ActBlue would be involved in more than just a financial processing or fiscal sponsorship role. I am glad you responsibly added “as of publication” because many details are still forthcoming due to an ongoing investigation into ActBlue by the FTC and the House.