Logic and reason……

So, if we don't have a King/wise elder to promise to oversee the running of the justice system then we'll have to appoint someone else to do the same job, right! Or would the justice system just run by itself?! Or would we just not have a justice system at all and hope that no harm befalls us?

Whenever we hire someone to do a job we expect them to imploy their wisdom to get the job done. The King promises to get the job done. He places himself under accountability.

Is a CEO of a company a tyrant just because the buck stops with him/her?

Can you see the circular reasoning in the arguments against kingship?!

A public servant is just one of us stepping forward to perform a role.

It is limitation by equal justice that prevents tyranny.

Whether you call it a king or whatever, the role is to promise to “govern", not to rule arbitrarily, but to “govern” which means to uphold the common law trial by jury. This is ancient custom.

Do you realise all that that role encompasses? Would you want to be responsible for the running of that framework and everything that it entails? Just think about that and clearly picture the vastness of what's involved.

Now, because we've forgotten what the true role of a king is and what equal justice for all is, everyone has fallen victim to propaganda and lies and now people are fearful, ignorant and confused. Where does that lead……chaos!

The constitution is about entrusting people to be responsible and holding them to account when the constitution is breached. But for that to happen a general understanding of equitable principle must be fully understood otherwise you invite tyranny, just like now! It's co responsibility. Unless you get deep into the principles of the constitution you'll continue to be manipulated.