Authorship can help an EB1A or O-1A case.

But a publication is not automatically acclaim.

For software engineers and AI professionals, I would map four things before buying a filing product:

1. Authorship: can the work be tied to you?

2. Venue: did it appear somewhere with a real audience or selection standard?

3. Attention: did anyone cite, use, invite, discuss, or rely on it?

4. Fit: does it support the field story in the rest of the record?

Weak version: one generic article or paper created only to fill a criterion box.

Stronger version: real technical work, credible venue, independent attention, and a case story that still holds after removing employer-brand halo.

I wrote the evidence map here:

chateb1.com/blog/eb1a-a…