Craig Christ, Ph.D. (@craigchrist): "You see, now they are using the words they use as an argument for actions. They are changing what “boots on the ground” means so that they can then say that is not what is happening. Stop twisting words to tell lies. Putting OUR military in THEIR territory, any inch of it, i…"

The app for independent voices

You see, now they are using the words they use as an argument for actions.

They are changing what “boots on the ground” means so that they can then say that is not what is happening.

Stop twisting words to tell lies. Putting OUR military in THEIR territory, any inch of it, is a “boots on the ground” invasion.

By his definition, there were no “boots on the ground” in Vietnam because we never occupied the entire country. We tried, but it didn’t work.

Aaron Rupar

Mar 20

C-SPAN: Would you consider the military taking over Kharg island boots on the ground?

REP. HARIDOPOLOS: I think people would see that as an occupation of a vital economic interest. As a history teacher, I consider boots on the ground occupying an entire country like we did after WW2 in Japan

Mar 20

4:33 PM

The app for independent voices

Log in or sign up