The app for independent voices

SmallBites's avatar

A 90 year old Holocaust survivor confronted Trump's ICE director.

SALUTE TO HIM!!!

Adam Kinzinger's avatar

I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period

Pete Buttigieg's avatar

The head of our country’s government is in the early stages of consolidating total power. We must of course reject this, but that is not enough. We have to respond by creating a different and better kind of American politics than we have seen before.

You made it, you own it

You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.

Dani Bee's avatar

perfect pair

Great discussions

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.

Rick Wilson's avatar

I support AOC’s bill to end stock trading in Congress. It is true “insider trading”.

Do you?

Steve QJ's avatar
Trying To Suggest Otherwise Based On Evidence And Data Is Gaslighting
Peaceful Dave's avatar

Speaking of being sheltered from facts - "killing unarmed people" - the myth that unarmed is an indication of not dangerous. The issue is viable threat, thus unarmed people in custody are shackled.

Chris Fox's avatar

And there is a wild conviction among gun advocates that the unarmed are the truly dangerous people, which is psychotic of course, and based on a lip-curling contempt for "gun-free zones" and the conviction that arming people in defense is the answer (it means more gun sales) instead of what we all know to be the solution: get rid of the guns.

That is a blatant misrepresentation of what I wrote and what gun advocates think.

I did not imply that the police, or anyone, should shoot people because they are dangerous. I was addressing the idea that "unarmed" is an indication of harmlessness.

Occupying militaries disarm the population where they go to reduce the ability to resist by the population. That is large scale. On a scale of individual interaction an unarmed person "can" be a deadly threat when in close proximity. It is the reason that when the police arrest you, they have you stand away from a wall or vehicle, legs spread, leaning on it with a hand on your back. Your feet are not under you, and you cannot move quickly, they can feel your sudden movement if you try. With the policeman's firearm in his holster, it is useless in unarmed combat. If you do try to resist/attack they try to throw you to the ground and kneel on you to pin you down. All of that is to prevent them from kicking their ass and killing them with their own gun.

An unarmed person is most often less deadly than an armed one, but my point was that unarmed cannot be taken to mean harmless. What are all of the other circumstances? I am in no way giving license to a police officer to shoot people who are no threat.

The last time I was stopped by the police I turned on my emergency blinkers to acknowledge him, slowed down and preceded to a spot where he didn't have to worry about getting hit by a car. While he was stopped behind me checking my license plate out, and me, I rolled down my window, got my driver's license, vehicle registration, insurance card and firearms permit out and had them in my hand with both wrists on top of my steering wheel when he approached. After handing them to him my wrists went back on top of my steering wheel to keep my hands in plain view. Being white is not immunity from being killed by a policeman who feels threatened.

He asked if I had a firearm with me. He knew I had a firearm permit before he approached my car since that showed up when he looked me up. I normally don't, but on that day I did. I told him that I did but it was inaccessible without me opening the door. If he wanted to see it I would tell him how, but I preferred to not touch it in his presence. He told me that it wasn't necessary for him to see it. I am extreme in insuring that I give a police officer no reason to "perceive" me to be a threat because he will act upon his perceptions. Like you, I am polite. I am mystified by people who give cops a blast of shit and expect a good result.

As for gun advocates thinking that the unarmed are the truly dangerous people, Zeus on Olympus! That is breathtakingly beyond hyperbole and disappointing.

1 Reply
Apr 17, 2023
at
3:09 PM