The app for independent voices

I'm going to quote a passage ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ต from Thomas Sowell's "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" and then put it into the context of your Commentary.

"'๐˜”๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฎ' ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด-๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ-๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ. ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ, ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ข ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด-๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ-๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ-๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด. ๐˜”๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ด, ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ. ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฎ--๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด--๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด--๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ, ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ, ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ."

Change ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ to ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† and ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ to ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€ and you have not only Walter but perhaps most of the people ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ these kinds of ideas. I currently have a good friend a bit pissed off at me because I called him out on calling everything he doesn't agree with a lie. He happens to be to my political right, but I see the same behavior in people to my political left. ๐˜›๐˜๐˜Œ๐˜  have warts, but not me. Did I just do that?

I see this as a source of so-called anti-CRT or "don't say gay" claims. The anti-CRT people say, "You are teaching my children to be ashamed of their white skin" and the CRT people are saying, "we want a non-whitewashed history to be taught" and then of course the ant-CRT people will say "You only want to talk about the warts on white people" and on and on it goes like the bloody Hatfield's and McCoys multi-generational feud that started in a dispute about a pig.

It might be helpful if people would say, "Let us not debate each other's straw men. Tell me exactly what you want. I'll tell you what I see as an issue, and you can tell me what you think is wrong with my perceived issue. We can do this in both directions." It would be really special if people occasionally spoke about good things, accomplishments and successes, rather than, "You evil bastards!" That is small scale, but it might be the best that we can do for now. A long running well thought public debate like The Federalists and anti-Federalists did with their papers would be just great, but if there is something like that out there, rather than attacks on straw men that you know of, I'd love to have you point to it.

Annnd, I left out the accusational name calling.

Sep 3, 2022
at
2:34 AM

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.