As pointed out in the comments, this post is misleading. It wants you to imagine that public broadcasters are just putting out advertisements for political slogans to make fewer people in Europe have babies. It plays into the classic right-wing narrative of taxpayer funds being used to promote degeneracy, with some in the comments going as far as to say that this is proof of "anti-white" propaganda. (I'll link a documentation of the whole dispute in the comments where I show this)

Now, if you examine this on its merits, it falls apart. Not only is this poster from the year 2020, it also doesn't just advertise a slogan. It is an advertisement for a documentary about a specific climate group in the UK that chose not to have children. I would have liked to verify if the documentary itself was any good, but I think it got taken down because of the regulations on public broadcasters, which say that their content gets deleted after 2 years.

This significantly impacts the evaluation of that case. It is an advertisement for a product made by a public broadcaster that examines an admittedly niche cultural debate. You can still say the product was bad or that you disagree with not having children because of climate change, but claiming that the poster existing is bad feels weird from the side that normally bangs on about the importance of open debate.