MEDICAL HYPOTHESIS: Risk/benefit analysis of vaccines is itself fake-science dupery

Accepting or recommending a risk/benefit analysis of vaccines is not a reasonable and balanced approach.

If one adopts the footing of risk/benefit analysis in evaluating vaccines, then one has already been preemptively duped into accepting that there is reliable evidence of some benefit.

There is not.

The entire push to present benefits from vaccination is contrived by interested and fraudulent actors, profiteers, and geopolitical entities, using fabricated and incorrectly presented statistics from staged and invented circumstances.

The said staged and invented circumstances include: personal clinical observations, epidemiological correlations, epidemiological counterfactual machinations, and comparative trials with all the "randomized controlled placebo etc." trimmings.

Valid trials performed by objective professionals are never funded and objective professionals do not exists. In the few exceptions that prove the rule, the results are banned from publication, or retracted, and their authors are thoroughly defamed and sidelined.

e.g., further reading: Rancourt, D. G. (2025). Opinion: Invalidity of counterfactual models of mortality averted by childhood vaccination. CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest.