The question that haunts all of cultural history and the enduring possibility of aristocratic civilization is: can a ruling counter-elite arise sui generis from a degenerate State, or must it come as a belligerent cultivated outside it?

This question is at the heart of the possibilities for dissident politics. The idea that the West is headed for a modern “Bronze Age” of destabilization and violence is actually very attractive to many on the Right, who recognize that the continued genetic humiliation and hormonal degradation of the pathetic bourgeois bugman cannot go on forever. Either the West will fall and fracture to the subservient and tech-complying (but intellectually and culturally inferior) Oriental and third-world races or Western men will have to re-attain their old genetic mastery. Can an “aristocratic” counter-elite emerge from the degenerate West and wipe away the filth of the egalitarian law codes and the mounds of longhoused bureaucracy, the rule of dysgenic bugmen, merchants and harpies? I say yes, but only as a multi-generational and far-sighted project that requires strategic use of the ubiquitous “sensitive young man.”

One of Alamariu’s great observations was to see the “aestheticization of the longhouse man” as being a kind of silent rebellion out of desperation for lost masculinity. If the “nerd” represents total male compliance with the longhouse and acceptance of gynocratic rule, the “SYM” represents the only personal rebellion possible short of futile criminality. Young men of intelligence get browbeaten early and often by endless reams of women in authority. Unable to go into sports (a problem in its own right) they don’t develop strong fraternities, and their only defense is to revere the “feminine” not out of fear, hatred and self-loathing (as the nerd or incel does) but out of the aesthetic splendor of woman’s form. The first blow is when the SYM discovers pornography and realizes just how dirt cheap “the beautiful form” of woman really is. The second blow comes when the SYM discovers that his reverence is biologically repulsive to women in a gynocratic culture and that his posture as an “aesthete” is just as repulsive to women as that of the “nerd.” This is simply biological law - you can only be a “romantic” from a position of validatory or status superiority - anything else and you are genetically (though not materially) repulsive.

The SYM begin to worship the cult of “Chad” - the man who is so fortified by internal confidence and genetic merit that he is validated by women, not the other way around. “Chad” is essentially the true deity and genetic destination of the Western SYM, chud and incel. Critics say this is a kind of intellectual “cuckoldry” but actually reverence for “Chad” is a kind of re-acknowledgment of male hierarchy in defiance of longhouse egalitarian inculcation. Without the return of acknowledged male charismatic and competence hierarchy, the destruction of the rule of women and geriatrics cannot take place. After all these harsh lessons the 21st century SYM begins to openly proclaim his longhouse revolt in the form of dissident politics.

But Gen Z SYM are of course in no position to achieve any meaningful political or social action. They are too testerogenically weak, too desperate for validation and essentially envious of the supreme validatory power of women in the technological gynocracy. My own experiences, both of myself and of others, testify to a kind of general “anhedonia” that plagues young men of my generation. This anhedonia is always sexual in origin, for whatever might be said about a man’s “lack of purpose” it has become clear that this cannot be decoupled from a man’s “genetic purpose” in the tech age of dopamagenic stimulation. Gen Z SYM have been destroyed by the “oppression of titillation” - the sheer volume of naked women which Gen Z have seen and not touched is a momentous revolution in the history of the human sex brain. It is a kind of psychobiological stupor, an internalization of one’s genetic inferiority as a male in the longhouse digital gooncage.

And yet there is a sense that the “sensitive young man” is preparatory to the kind of biologically superior man that can emerge as a real revolutionary. No men alive in America today have the psychic disposition to venture an organized overthrow of the democratic regime and very few even have the disposition to organize a young men’s study group. And yet it is the very hypersensitivity of Gen Z, the “broken romantic heart” of Gen Z men that will help fortify the next generation. This is a necessary stage in a multi-generational “coarsening”, the realization that there is no aesthetic solution to the crisis of broken, validation starved men. The Gen Z aesthete is too intense for atomizing normie bourgeois culture and yet he is too psychogenetically inadequate to be an “aristocrat” or have any hope for status advancement outside of longhouse submission. He is personally doomed except as a genetic vector for a new crop of men who will be genetically fortified for the task of overthrow.

I encourage sensitive young men in the middle class to marry and have children with pretty women with mental troubles. Many troubled women have very good genes and only suffer and inflict chaos because they’re trapped in the same bourgeois cage. For god’s sake stop looking for a “pure” bourgeois wife - instead your task is to make a wonderful, kaleidoscopic bonfire of the genes of the next revolutionary generation. As a SYM, you must raise your sons to recognize their slavery from an early age, to defy all authority that doesn’t emanate from testerogenic merit. Unlike the cucked Boomers, you must be proud of the day your son rejects your generation (and you yourself) as hormonal failures. He is merely accurate.