Here is a Biofoundational trait assessment/writing physiognomy breakdown of Miss Georgi to see if we can deduce her education based off what I see in her profile and a couple interactions.

Observations:

• Sci-fi author

  • Systemizing that underpins narratives and stories. World-building, inventing rule-based structure, extrapolating consequences from premises, constructing frameworks and consistently applying to characters.

  • Female systemizing has strong impulse for verbal systemizing rather than engineering/physical/motion-based systemization (overwhelmingly male for spatial/hippocampus reasons).

• Happily married, respects husband (confirmed has fatherly presence)

  • Per this, I assume she has good relationship with her father. A woman calibrated by a strong father selects for a man she respects, not one she manages. Not threatened by masculine competence because she was raised by it. This likely had major influence on her conservative tilt.

• Conservative (for a woman)

  • Per the Biofoundationalism Moral Genotype framework (linked below), the feminine baseline is biologically biased toward care/harm, fairness-as-compassion, universalist empathy, dignity.

    • A woman who skews conservative has a masculine moral genotype expressing through female biology. She weights authority, loyalty, proportionality, and order (honor-based traits) more heavily than sex-typical distribution predicts.

  • Her amygdala-level association with hierarchy and boundaries associates it with safety, not a threat/oppressive.

  • She seems to be conservative without the defensive posture you see in some influencers (”look at how based I am!”) who arrived at conservatism through trauma, reaction, or attention whoring.

    • She's not conservative against something, but because the architecture feels like home. Father presence gave her a functional template and comfort with competent masculinity.

Most likely educational background:

• Political Science, Anthropology, maybe History.

  • Allows a systemizing woman to not end up in STEM. Chronicles new worlds and models of human organization (Sci-fi + female conservatism)

  • High verbal intelligence (published author) correlates with humanities education

Possible other educational focuses (masculine influence):

• Classics/Theology: I’d expect a conservative temperament raised in orderly household to have penchant for the Great Books/Western canon and religious tradition.

  • These take hierarchy and order as subjects of serious study rather than oppressors to deconstruct.

Biofoundationalist notes:

These fields provide conservative-leaning women people-and-language oriented focus with forms of systems thinking while still expressing rules, authority, boundary-maintenance.

Women skew heavily for “people over things”, but conservative women are likely a subset more open to “things” if they’re institutions made of language (courts, precedent, laws) or studies focusing explicitly on human organization (anthropology, political science). These fields have high liberal valence on an absolute basis (selection effects of universities), but if you give me a masculine-respecting/conservative woman I’d expect her to more readily find a home here.

Basically all women have high ‘people over things’ preference (very robust cross-culturally) unless they’re biological exceptions: e.g. they have high androgens/PCOS or are very autistic.

Biofoundationalism II: The Moral Genotype:

thedosagemakesitso.subs…