The app for independent voices

In my view, they’re doing they’d darnedest to make sure you regard this event EXACTLY as they want you to. Specifically, that there WAS a novel virus (I’m not alone in originally believing that myself, but over time, I’ve seen sufficient evidence that casts severe doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’etat, I have put myself in the position as the seniormost, hidden perpetrators. In Q&A, they’d learn that the effects of a released, novel pathogen simply couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or, it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, collapsing advanced civilizations. Those top decision makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is simply intolerable to them. The crave total control & the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action. “No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes”. The alternative that I think they’ve used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair. The lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which, crucially, caused massive scale illness and deaths. Instead, they simply TOLD us there was this frightening, novel pathogen & ramped up the stress-inducing fear porn to 11 & held it there. Cheating about genetic sequences, PCR test protocols (probes, primers, amplification and annealing conditions, cycles, ignoring contaminating genetic materials from not only human and claimed viral sources, but also bacterial and fungal sources. Why did they insert the sampling sticks right into our sinuses? Was it to maximise non-human genetic sequences? Notice the soft evidence that our wondrous leaders, including Queen Elizabeth II, were happy to meet & greet one another, without testing, masking or social distancing. They had no fear. In the scenario above, a few people would known there was no new hazard in their environment. If there really was a lethal pathogen stalking the land, I don’t believe they’ve the courage to act nonchalantly and risk exposure. Most convincingly, for me at least, is the all causes mortality data by state, sex, age & date of occurrence, as analysed by Denis Rancourt and colleagues. The patterns of increased ACM is inconsistent with the presence of a novel, respiratory virus as the main cause. If I’m correct, what a genius move if was merely to pretend there was They want you ONLY to consider how said virus got into the human population. Was it a natural emergence (you know, a wild, horseshoe bat bit an innocent pangolin & this ended up being sold out of a wet market in Wuhan) or was it hubristically created by a Chinese researcher, enabled, along the way, by a dastardly researcher at UNC, making an end run around a presidential pause on such work? Then there’s the frisson on the question as to whether the arrival of this “killer virus” in the general public was down to carelessness and a lab leak, or did someone deliberately spread it? I close by pointing out that the perpetrators have hermetic control of the mass media. That’s why they’ve found it so easy to censor people like me. If a story appears on multiple TV networks, it’s because they’re either OK with it or they actively planted it, it won’t be genuine. I don’t think they’ve told the truth since this coup began. I believe I’ve established that the perpetrators planted the controversy about origins of SARS-CoV-2, because a little embarrassment of the establishment was a small price to pay in order to persuade most of us that there surely must be a novel virus when, in fact, there isn’t. I have colleagues who do not believe what we’ve been told has happened is even possible technologically. I don’t have the background to be able to assess that idea. But the rest hangs together for me in a way that no other explanation does. In closing, I’m not saying people weren’t sick or that they didn’t die in huge numbers. I’m arguing only about the causes of illnesses and deaths. They were made such & sone killed by all the pre-existing causes, amplified by fear, resulting immunosuppression & then a swath of revolting actions. They chopped antibiotic prescriptions by 50% durujg 2020. They endured very large numbers of frail elderly people were mechanically ventilated, a procedure which, in such subjects, is close to contraindicated. They were administered renal toxin, remdesivir. They were given midazolam and morphine, synergistic respiratory depressant drugs which are also all but contradicted in patients with breathing difficulties. The main reason for the lies about the novel virus is total predictability and control, with the intention to begin dismantling modern society with lockdowns and furlough. The immediate practical goal was to inject as many people as possible with materials designed not to induce immunity, but to cause injury, maiming and death. The chickens are coming home to roost, right now in the banking system. As I always say, I cannot know much for sure, and this is among them. I don’t have a copy of the script. By the way, whatever it actually is, I don’t believe what they called influenza disappeared conveniently in early 2020. Best wishes Mike

Mar 15, 2023
at
9:33 AM

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.