It wouldn’t, I expect, because the authors are US researchers. You’d have to check the details of the methodology section.

Remember they disregarded adverse events including injuries and deaths due to these injections.

It’s important to realise that we don’t know what was in the vials. We can’t trust official disclosures because the regulatory system for notional vaccines is corrupt and inoperative according to the careful research of Katherine Watt here on Substack. Per Sasha Latypova’s analysis of VAERS, we know that different batch numbers (excluding AZ, not distributed in the USA) were associated with extraordinarily different outcomes. Some were orders of magnitude more damaging in terms of reported prevalence of adverse events.

The researcher who first spotted this was a Brit called Craig Paardekooper and it was upon reading his articles that Sasha & I met, because we both knew immediately what it meant: these products were not the result of conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing and regulation.

Early on, when I hadn’t grasped the depth of the evil, I attributed the variations in toxicity to careless manufacturing.

Later & still today, I believe they were calibrating weapons. Because that’s what these are.

Then & now I theorised that somehow the perpetrators intended to establish a system under which we’d all be required to be “vaccinated” frequently. Under this hypothetical, they’d use the results of calibration to murder people at whatever rate they deemed appropriate.

This also tallies with why the worldwide average kill rate now is a lot lower than I guessed it was early in 2021. Early batches included the particularly toxic batches. Later on they settled into using less toxic batches.

Construction of factories for the manufacture of billions of doses per year have been reported. I wonder what is intended for the output of such factories?