EVEN IF there’d been a pandemic (& I don’t believe they’re immunologically possible, which is why every claim to such events are demonstrably fraudulent), some things follow:

1. No one in their right mind would reach for a “vaccine” as a solution. Making a new, complex biological product takes far longer than the longest period of time that any alleged pandemic has ever lasted.

2. Even if you could magick up a “vaccine”, you’d NEVER insist on offering it to everyone, regardless of their risk profile. This because every treatment carries risks and these are never fully understood in the early stages of commercial use. So, three categories of people to whom you’d NEVER even offer it, let alone coerce people to accept:

A/ those who have had & recovered from the alleged illness. They must be immune. If they’re not, then you won’t be able to render them immune with a “vaccine”.

B/ those at no risk from the illness. Healthy children, for example. No deaths in Sweden, even though primary schools never closed.

C/ pregnant women. Since thalidomide, no new or recently launched product is even offered to pregnant women, even when there’s an argument that they might benefit. This because new products, especially those for which basic reproductive toxicology has not even been conducted, are considered presumptive fetal toxins.

For avoidance of doubt, I’m using narrative speak to make my point.

There hasn’t been a pandemic.

Acute respiratory illnesses aren’t infectious in nature nor contagious.

Consequently there’s no new virus & nothing was “spreading”, nor is covid19 a new illness. Instead it’s deliberate misattribution of other, pre-existing illnesses.

The materials masquerading as “vaccines” are cleverly designed toxins, intended to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.