I have some land to sell you on MARS. I could say same. You need to address what I am asking: there is no way that the mRNA could have stayed at the injection site and worked. He knew that. He did not tell people that when the CDC et al. were lying. Thats all. He knew they were lying (CDC et al.) and remained silent, even up to taking the shot. Why? I don't think he is malevolent, never said that. But why was he silent when he knew they were lying. If he did in fact take it. He knew something that we were lied to about by the CDC etc. and it was incumbent on him to have told the public. He said he invented it. I hope you understand what I asked. Why were you silent? Did they tell you to be silent? Why? Was he threatened? What was the reason for his silence for I would have not been silent had I been involved and knew this piece of information. This question is such a serious one for people died. These questions just require an honest answer and not from defenders of him. He has to answer and he will have to as investigations go on and they will and he is asked to help set the table and understand the fundaments. This is about knowing the nuts and bolts as we figure out nefarious intent. Not about blame or supposition. We just want some basic information. Concrete evidence.