Crucifixion was for pedophiles?

There exists the belief that Jesus was arrested due to being in a garden with a young boy, who is described as having no clothes on. Even after I became convinced Christianity was a Jewish Psy-Op, I was still on the fence about the theory that Jesus was arrested and crucified due to the naked boy. But I am now convinced of it. My doubts have been shattered because there is very strong evidence for this controversial theory.

Crucifixion was often reserved for the most heinous crimes, such as child trafficking and sex crimes against children. The crucified body would be left to rot, which is why it’s displayed publicly – which is part of why the standard crucifixion narrative doesn’t add up. Jesus wouldn’t’ve been taken down after crucifixion. The body would’ve been left displayed publicly to rot, which was part of the purpose of crucifixion.

Roman authorities would often cover up taboo sex crimes against minors, and replace the charge with a false political charge. Hence, the “King of the Jews” political charge, as a cover up. This is because such crimes were considered taboo, and the public would be given a false political charge. Historians ignore this, and only pay attention to the narrative given to the public, which results in the deception continuing.

You may be thinking “But isn’t it a contradiction, to both have a public crucifixion and then try to cover up the charge?” No, because just because it was a public crucifixion, that doesn’t mean the public would know the precise details of the charge, just that it was some kind of sexual offense.

The false political charge would’ve given the historical Sanhedrin (the pharisees) a totally blank charge, where they could construct whatever narrative they wanted, under the “King of the Jews” political narrative. The charge would’ve been blank, which would’ve given them the opportunity to construct whatever story they wanted around it. What I’ve come to know, explains so much, and the missing puzzle pieces for this 2,000 + year old hoax, are finally fitting. The puzzle pieces are coming together and it’s making sense, regardless of how dark the implications are.

Christianity is a convoluted fiction. Christianity is a massive lie. The problem with keeping a lie, is that it always becomes more convoluted overtime, which is what you can see when examining the standard Jesus narrative. It doesn’t make sense, because it’s clearly made up. The reason the standard narrative doesn’t make sense, is because it is a lie.

The most plausible explanation is that Jesus was arrested for sexual crimes against a young boy (the naked boy in the garden described in the Bible.) It doesn’t involve convoluted explanations, especially since Jesus screams “I am not a leistes/child trafficker” when confronted by the Romans. The truth always eventually comes out, even the truth about the “King of the Jews.” Not even Jesus can hide from the reality of history.

Corrupt historians try to cover up this information, and often claim “leistes” meant something else, even though “leistes” did often refer to a child trafficker, and that crucifixion was often reserved for taboo sex crimes. The vast majority of historians (especially historically speaking) are either Christian or funded by Christian institutions like various universities. They are biased, and they nearly always try to cover up the truth. But they cannot hide from the truth forever.

When employed by Christian universities and institutions, historians take an oath called the “Statement of Faith” where they vow to never contradict Christianity. If historians break their oath, they lose their funding and are blacklisted. Hence, why the lie of Christianity has been promoted by historians for over two thousand years. The historians are paid to promote Christianity and to never contradict it, out of threat of losing funding. The very people who have been handpicked to provide a narrative to the public (the historians) are the most biased people that could’ve been chosen. They are people who have direct funding from Christian institutions. When you are being delivered a narrative from people with such extreme bias, it cannot be trusted. It is textbook corruption.

The truth is often simple and Jesus was arrested for the reasons I explained. He was nothing more than a jew and the gentile world got tricked into worshiping him by the jews - the historical Sanhedrin, which Paul, Peter and even arguably James would’ve been working for. And Jesus was arrested for being in the garden with a naked young boy, and the true charge got covered up, which was standard for Romans to do with sexual charges involving minors. It also explains why the name of the boy is omitted in the Bible. It’s because the victim’s name is often withheld. Think about it – the Bible gives names for even the most obscure characters, but oddly never the naked boy. It’s because the boy’s name was deliberately withheld by Roman authorities, because they wanted to protect the identity of the victim, which was also standard practice. The puzzle pieces fit, and it’s the simple straightforward explanation, and syncs up with Roman crucifixion for sex crimes against minors.

Why would the jews want a child abuser to be worshiped? The answer to that, is darker than you can ever imagine, and it has to do with what the jews really believe, and why Christianity is a humiliation ritual for gentiles. There are also very dark spiritual implications for such a thing. What do you think would happen to an institution that worshiped such a figure? Do you think there would be signs you could see, such as sex scandals involving children, as the result from worshiping such a dark figure? What do you think the spiritual implications would be, for those who unknowingly prayed to a figure meant to serve as a humiliation ritual? I’ll save all that for another article. The truth is unbelievably dark. Stay tuned.