Like, that’s a core part of the critique and I literally have not seen a single person engage with it or acknowledge it in any way. Just a lot of yelping about “free speech” and “censorship” and “neutral platform” and assorted other bullshit? It’s a fundamentally dishonest way of engaging, and betrays a weakness in their actual position. Defend Substack repeatedly promoting Richard Hanania, if that’s your thing. But if you’re just gonna ignore it, that’s dishonest.