If the case is about his speech alone, no matter how noxious, he shouldn’t be deported.

However, let’s square a logical inconsistency in Matt’s (and others’) defense of him. He wasn’t just speaking. He was a SPOKESPERSON for an entire movement that was conducting illegal activity who yet somehow wasn’t involved in any of these actions? As someone who got a taste of the behind the scenes of campus protest as an undergraduate, let me tell you: there is no way someone becomes a spokesperson for a protest movement without being intimately involved in the planning and execution of that movement’s actions. That he presumed to speak on their behalf suggests some degree of coordination with them if not control.

This is what we need to have aired to the public to assuage those (like me) who agree with Matt IF it’s a speech issue alone but disagree if it involves coordination and control of illegal protest. Was Khalil involved in any of these illegal activities behind the scenes? Release the evidence.