The app for independent voices

Here's the most succinct explanation of why we're being depopulated via death jabs.

Our collective health has been destroyed by "vaccines," and now, due to our being a "net drain" on the government's budget, we're too expensive to maintain.

So they're slaughtering us.

This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova is taken from a conversation with Liz Gunn and Jim Ferguson posted to Rumble on August 28, 2025. 

---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------

"Right, so just, this week, yesterday I published an article discussing some of these motivations. And in my personal approach, I like to stay close to the crime scene. I don't want to jump too far away from it. So you have to walk back very methodically from here's the body, who injected, who told the injector to inject. How did— you arrive at the DoD as the chief operating officer, okay, we've covered that.

"The next step for me is why is this in the interest. So what we found, together with Katherine Watt, with her help, because she's traced all this relevant law in the US, the so-called communicable disease law stems, goes back way back to late 1700s and from the very beginning, and let's say, you know, starting somewhere in the late 1800s, this kind of language starts appearing. Especially from early you know, early 20th century, we have this language appearing that hey, you know, you know, we have a U.S. constitution.

"We have, you know, freedom, liberty, pursuit of happiness, all that. We have amendments that, that protect our rights as citizens in the US, the Constitution is probably the most robust legal document ostensibly protecting the rights of people against the government, as it should. And we have the right, the first Amendment and second Amendment, we, we, we have the right to,  to sue in court, seek remedies, nobody can dispossess us of property and so forth. However—

"And this whole exercise, so as my colleague Katherine was tracing this law and I'm reading it and, she's reading it and we're discussing it. What became very apparent is that they always, for the long time, over 100 years at least, the US government explicitly carved out, all of this Constitution is all good, except when we, the government say that we have a compelling interest to override it.

"The most compelling, and they most often, when they override it, is the compelling interest that they claim is communicable disease prevention. This communicable disease prevention language, have always been used as an excuse to violate constitution for the government and to gain access to every human, every child's body, specifically.

"And so this is just a continuation of all that trend. Now, the way the law is written and even the reason I published this article is because there was a letter circulated from Health and Human Services Office, of civil rights. I actually didn't know they had. But they have an Office of Civil Rights. And this office sent a letter to Governor of the Health Department, sorry, of West Virginia, one of the states, because West Virginia has this really, draconian compulsory vaccination law.

"And so the letter sounded at the opening like a good thing. They were saying stuff like, if you are not recognizing the constitutional rights of West Virginians, your federal, funding is in jeopardy. And I was like, wow, this is great. Except. And then they have on. On second page, this, compelling government interest language comes in play. And also it's compelling government interest in the least restrictive way, which is vaccination.

"So that's how they, you know, manage this. And now the people are asking me, well, okay, why is it, why is it an interest of the United States to hurt all the people, especially children? Because you need growing population for economic growth. You need the more younger workers versus the retirees for the Social Security to work. And those economic theories, saying that government is always interested in increasing population and in the healthy population right? Now that's true, in theory, in practice in the US because of essentially over 100 years of this vaccination, especially since, the late '80s when the National Vaccine Injury act came in place, the CDC schedule exploded.

"So now before there were maybe three, four shots, then five shots. Now we have 90 shots. Now they are adding on, in addition to the vaccines, they're also adding on monoclonal antibodies for newborns, for all newborns, which are not vaccines. The injection schedule blew up. As a result, 75% of the US population is chronically ill. About 65% of children are chronically ill. Most become disabled very early. The disability skyrocketed. Especially disability rates skyrocketed, after the rollout of COVID shots.

"Ed Dowd actually published really good data on this. What I'm saying is, while economic theory tells you you're interested in the growing population, if 3 out 4 of your newborns are going to become disabled and go on the government dole, as a government, you're not interested in the growth of that population. It's a net drain on your budget, no matter how fast. The faster it grows, the faster you're going to go bankrupt. That's why they're interested in reducing the population. It's a compelling government interest. And the least restrictive way is to continue to vaccinate."

-Credit Sense Receptor for the clip

Sep 5
at
9:48 AM

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.