The responses to this moral conundrum have put on full display the anti-Whiteness of supposedly ‘pro-White’ online personalities.
It also reinforced the position I’ve held for some time that ‘the Right’ is not a viable vehicle for White interests. ‘The Right’ is always looking for a way to be ‘more moral’ than their enemies, which results in them adopting the anti-White ‘morality’ of their enemy.
The Right cannot save White people because, in the end, it refuses to discriminate between the intrinsic value of actually-existing Whites, and the ‘intrinsic value’ of their ‘morals’.
The problem, of course, is that the morals they care about are only a feature of White bioculture and do not exist independently from it.
Anyone willing to harm a White in order to protect a non-White is a race-traitor.
It doesn’t really matter what the context is.
You’re a race-traitor is you privilege non-Whites over Whites for any reason.
If you cannot accept that a White pedophile harming non-White children isn’t doing anything wrong, you’re probably not going to be able to go the distance in saving the White race from its enemies.
Nov 8
at
8:10 PM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.