I was considering writing a response to Kitten's post but am content with restacking this one. One thing I do want to highlight is Kitten saying:

The citizen-led anti-ICE operations taking place in Minneapolis and in every city where ICE shows its masked faces are better understood as a kind of militia action, rather than as a form of protest. Even when technically non-violent in nature, these operations are designed to provoke a violent response from law enforcement, thereby producing mediagenic victims to use in propaganda.

It's very telling that Kitten is trying his best to portray non-violent protest as militia action. It seems that in his view, protest is only really protest when it is noncoercive, that is to say ineffectual, and that everything else is tantamount to violence. And of course, he must believe this in order to argue that we our current moment is a "slowly simmering maybe-civil-war" that risks breaking down into 1970s-level violence, because if he didn't see non-violent protest as equivalent to militia action, he would have an incredibly hard time insinuating that the non-violent protestors are inciting violence and thus are at fault for being murdered.

Ironically, those DHS screenshots you linked explicitly admit that agent noncompliance and passively disobeying agent commands are LEGAL. Not even the Trump administration buys his case.