Exactly. The logical fallacy of stating that sex is ambiguous for everyone, and on a spectrum, and therefore meaningless, and then insisting that teenage girls and boys MUST be chemically and surgically altered in dangerously unhealthy ways to appear as (and “be”) the opposite sex, or the will die of depression, and men whom wish they were women must be treated as women, is too obvious to explain.

Yet somehow, activists argue both of these points as if they are consistent. Either there are males and females, and some people desperately wish they were the opposite sex, but are not the opposite sex, and we can discuss how to deal with those wishes, or there is no such a thing as a “sex” and nobody is really male or female, in which case all categories for male and female have to be gone. No women’s sports or bathrooms or changing rooms - just unisex everything. I don’t think too many trans activists want this. “Trans women” want to be treated as women, not as part of a unisex species. My trans identified daughter wants to be treated as a boy. Thus, these people assume the existence of “men” and “women” and “boys” and “girls.” They don’t believe sex is on a spectrum, but just argue it to muddy the waters and justify the right to claim to be the opposite sex - because sex is unclear. But again, if it’s so unclear, what makes a trans woman a woman or a trans man a man? Aren’t they just part of an ambiguous spectrum? None of it makes sense.