Comment
The app for independent voices
Your article is, as always, completely on target. The bumbling was monumental. Your doctor's perspective on effectiveness of these measures is most valued.
But I just wanted to make a somewhat unrelated comment: the people who are pretending to be saving us, were the same people who financed virology and specifically project DEFUSE, with Sars-Cov-2 likely developed at UNC by Ralph Baric.
The virus they designed, has many lab features (HIV inserts) adding extra pathogenic pathways, like infecting …
I did not go into that because it's beyond the scope of this (as I'm sure you know). On that topic, could you read the addendum I added to this article? It is the eight paragraphs before the introduction, specifically in reference to the GP 120 and Maraviroc. https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/adverse-reactions-to-covid-vaccines
I also only engage on the outskirts of this topic for many reasons. Partly because this topic needs to be addressed from outside in (like onion). Once you peel one layer of the onion, other layers become visible.
I do find myself mostly agreeing with your bulleted list.
Do you know if doctors who run routine CBC panels noticed anything unusual with lymphocytes or other bloodwork of boosted patients?