. . . or are we just the United Nation of Chimps? . . .

I had thought I would entirely avoid this fake controversy, but today I realized as I listened to the PBD podcast that both objectors and defenders seem to be missing the point.

First: I don't understand why liberals -- who demand that we believe that we're all descended from primates -- would SINCERELY be offended by anyone being compared to monkeys.

Of course they're not really offended; they're just PRETENDING to be offended.

Second: notice how the former (i.e., 2008-2017) First Family are portrayed. Barack might be a monkey -- hard to tell, though. But his spouse is most definitely a gorilla.

It's obvious that the point of this had nothing to do with monkeys; THE POINT IS THAT MICHELLE IS PORTRAYED AS BEING FAR MORE MASCULINE THAN HIR HUSBAND.

This broom-ha-ha is landing at a time of increasing boredom with wokeness and increasing black fatigue. Which is it?: you're so powerful that whites are all afraid of you? or you're so fragile that you couldn't survive being equated to monkeys?

Monkeys are cool. They can dance. They can jump high. And they don't mind masturbating in public.