I’m happy to take another walk with The Federalists as I look at the political landscape. It’s not your average rage bait. Like Hamilton, I think good debate and deliberate action make us a great Republic.
When prophecy becomes headline news, don't run in fear—look up in faith. These are not the moments to retreat from the world, but to shine brighter than ever before. The darker it gets, the more your light matters.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
This feels like a step too far towards theocracy. Isn’t it the case that the successful imposition of present ideologies of climate, vaccine, immigration, and gender, etc, are the result of governments feeling entitled to impose their morality on the people, in contravention of the rules and principles under which we charged them to do their job? I think that if governments have power to enforce their morality over people, we’ll be straight back to the present madnesses in no time at all.
Potentially, but what I often feel is missed with the "isn't this the same as what we have now" argument is the most important: the content of the morality. In my opinion, the fact that government sometimes imposes morally based laws is not the problem, it's which morally based laws they impose.
Vaccine mandates, gender madness and the other things you listed are principly poor morals. In fact, I think the generic libertarian idea of letting the free market determine where unvaccinated people sh…
I understand the concern, but there are moral values which, if followed, lead to objectively better outcomes for society. Similarly, there are values which, if followed, objectively lead to the fragmentation and desecration of functioning society.
We should be advocating the former regardless of whether that may sometimes increase the size and scope of government.