Curt and I are the primary writers for the Tucson Agenda but we work closely with our colleagues at the Arizona Agenda, as well as some freelancers.

I can post the court paperwork from Shaw's case but IIRC they didn't get into the details of their decision. I believe it was made from the bench.

It wasn't about $$.

Yes, there is a potential as a tipping point, but the voters affected was ~ 70. If they were allowed to vote (it is unclear whether they did or not - we just know they were affected.) they would still have to vote in a disproportionate number for Shaw to prevail.

It is unclear whether such a decision would impact other races, as Shaw was asking for a new election. If granted, how would this impact the general election? Would we have am empty seat in Ward 3 come December?