Do you think that being added to the Russell 1000 and the $140 million in forced buying that comes with it effectively "sanitizes" Freedom Holding’s reputation in the eyes of institutional investors, or does it just create a more dangerous trap for passive funds that are now forced to ignore the Hindenburg allegations? :)
I’ve subscribed and would be happy to support each other.
Jorrit
Feb 25
at
7:37 PM
Relevant people
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.