Comment

Agree completely. Further support for the pandemic fiction is found in the all cause mortality data — COVID-19 produced no excess deaths; it was, instead, a normal year with a normal number of influenza-related deaths. The excess deaths do not appear until the introduction of the “vaccines.”

I remember one of the dissenting doctors at the beginning stating that we had a “pandemic of testing” — that if we had conducted similar test protocols during any normal ‘flu season, we’d have gotten the same results. I also remember pointing out to Covidiot friends as the death data accumulated that the numbers were no worse than an average ‘flu season, a statement that was met with a mixture of disbelief and disgust, as if I were callously discounting the lives lost, and dancing on the graves, rather than trying to assert a less emotional, more rational perspective.

The results of the constant fear porn are still evident today in people who ought to know better. “So-and-so has COVID” is akin to saying that someone has stage 4 cancer. People my age are at risk from any flavor of ‘flu — our expiration date is just over the horizon. The mystical power that’s been attached to COVID carries an extra layer of anxiety that is undeserved and counterproductive. And stupid. We should stop using the term altogether — “the ‘flu” is just as accurate and far less psychologically charged. We also need to stop referring to the gene therapy injections as “vaccines” — they are not. At the same time, the definition of “vaccine” needs to revert to its pre-mRNA form, not the alteration to the meaning applied so the gene therapy injections would qualify as “vaccines.” Small things, but language matters.

Then we can move on to the trials and the executions.