Hi Steve,

Hope you are well, my friend.

Am not sure why we focus on this irrelevant issue. Pardon the bluntness.

Opposition will use this against us to demonstrate we are biased, anti-vax and looking at irrelevant details.

Even Kevin says it's not major. Hear me out.

It seem quite obvious that the cost and/or the technical capacity makes it impossible for Pfizer to filter out the DNA. That means that billions have had it, including you btw, and billions are fine.

So Marc, why don't you spell out what you mean by "the only theory that proves it all"? It would be nice to know what you are referring to.

And also, why is John Campbell the "exception"? Because he is a trained medical person who has come to the conclusion that he's been hoodwinked? i think there are a lot of such folks around. What do you mean?

The Bolus Theory explains all the adverse events observed, including cancer.

John Campbell interviewed me 7 months ago, and completely bought into the theory. He qualified my work as"superb" and as "an impressive body of work".

I thought I had seen all of Mr. Campbell's videos but I guess I missed yours.

I'll go back and view it. Thank you.

Well, I actually did see that one. Your picture here looks different so I thought you were someone different. Here's another question: How about the Danish study that shows 1/3 of folks apparently received inert material and had no ill effects, another 1/3 had moderate side effects, and the final 1/3 had more serious effects? And the timing of these shots showed that the more serious effects came early in the vaccination effort. I don't see how your bolus theory, though possibly correct in gene…

That was debunked. There was delayed reporting from whqt I understand. In other countries these lots had harmed the same .