Guess I’ll just keep repeating this until more people are aware of it: More than few key western feminists supported pedophilia.

Kate Millett believed that “sexual freedom of children is an important part of a sexual revolution,” and that age of consent laws were oppressive.

Shulamith Firestone wanted to create a society that looked as follows: “Thus without the incest taboo, adults might return within a few generations to a more natural polymorphuous sexuality, the concentration on genital sex and orgasmic pleasure giving way to total physical/emotional relationships that included that. Relations with children would include as much genital sex as the child was capable of — probably considerably more than we now believe.”

Gayle Rubin, whom you can thank for writing a text that served as a foundation of “gay and lesbian studies,” along with queer theory and the “queer” identity, complained that “boy lovers” were being stigmatized and unfairly targeted.

Pat Califia: “Any child enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in somebody’s lap or engage in sexual activity. We should be working to end the artificial state of sexual ignorance that children are kept in — not perpetuating it or defending it,” and said that true child abusers are “priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force their stale morality onto the young people in their custody,” and “Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them. They need us badly.”

Camille Paglia supported NAMBLA, child nude modeling, and bragged how her book influenced boys to engage with adult men since at least 90s.

Simone de Beauvoir groomed kids for Sartre while working as a teacher, then became a notable feminist & influenced western feminism as a whole. And even afterwards she supported abolishing age of consent laws by signing an open letter in support of three men who were raping kids, claiming the children consented, and that if they can be held liable for committing crime, they can consent. This was signed by other leftists intellectuals as well, including Sartre. A few years later, another open letter was signed by dozens of intellectuals and feminists, in support of a man who raped kids as young as 6 years old.

It argued that the girls in question were “happy” with the situation. “The love of children is also the love of their bodies,” they wrote. “Desire and sexual games have their place in the relationship between children and adults. This is what Gérard R. thought and experienced with [the] girls … whose fulfillment proved to everyone, including their parents, the happiness they found with him.”

Also: When NOW issued a statement against those who supported pedophilia and “public sex,” dozens of feminists & academics wrote two different open letters condemning them over it

The point being: The idea that feminism & Islam are incompatible because of pedophilia is based on ignorance of what feminism is & has been.