Make money doing the work you believe in

I couldnt diagree with this article any more. Heres my critique:

  1. The scientific method has assumptions about reality

  2. These main assumptions are pre-conditions for doing science i. E mind-independant reality, stable regularities that generalise (induction) and empiricism (observations are connected to the world in a way that allows hypotheses to be checked)

  3. Because these assumptions are pre-conditions for doing science then you can’t validate them through doing science alone without circularity

  4. Therefore to avoid circularity you need an outside discipline to evaluate these assumptions i. E philosophy, particularly metaphysics

In refusing to question these assumptions, to do a priori metaphysics, you fail to put the scientific method itself on non-circular ground and thus reifies these ungrounded assumptions into an ideology - which is the opposite of the pursuit of truth.

To Hell with A Priori Metaphysics
Feb 19
at
3:57 PM
Relevant people

Log in or sign up

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.