One of the great modern misconceptions is that Change is good for us. Change is neutral. Good change is good, bad change is not good. Before jumping on the change bandwagon, people need to evaluate whether it is a good change which leads to benefits or something that is useless or may actually be worse. This seems to be something few people other than ethical scientists actually do. Most people just want any change, ANY change that might give them hope and mend their broken lives and bodies. Ca…
Project 2025’s agenda is Trump Ms agenda and I am worried that personhood is next
Thank you for your article on how these actions will have grave consequences for all people in the US, especially women. What can we do besides call our reps and ask Congress to intervene? This is all so concerning, and I have a child with a disability. It’s hard to believe we had a system that was reliable and worked and now we’re in uncharted territory. It’s very scary.
Oy. It's hard to hit "like" on information so dour. Thank you for sharing. It needed to be said. It begs the question, how does one protect oneself if things progress as RK would have them? Do we only take medications, supplements, and have procedures done which were in existence for many years prior to his takeover? How do we trust what is coming through the medical establishment under the new regime? I can see why this would be horrifying to practitioners who care about outcomes and patients!
I'm curious why you say you want your money back.
I find these reports comprehensive, straightforward, and informative -- and incredibly important, especially now with the orange goon in the White House -- even if I don't agree with every political stance Dr. Gunter takes (such as trans ideology). I think it's important that we support strong women and science-based medical information.
Obviously you don't have to reply. I'm just curious why you would post your comment. Thanks.