The app for independent voices

Adam Kinzinger's avatar

I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period

Jasmine Crockett's avatar

We live in a time that people are more inclined to obey an unlawful executive order than they are to follow a court order 🤦🏾‍♀️.

Dictators are created due to cruelty, cowardice, & compliance! IF THEIR ASSES will ignore the Supreme Court, we can definitely IGNORE HIM!

Nika Bella Vita's avatar

You made it, you own it

You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.

Joe C.'s avatar
Infant drowns in Paver Barnes Road pond Sunday evening
Diane Lee's avatar

YES !!! 💪💯🎯

It’s about damn time. AOC is a hero. She’s one of the best out there, fighting daily against Trump’s fascist bullshit.

Great discussions

Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.

Moms Justice Alerts's avatar

Do you back RFK Jr. in his effort to BAN all pharmaceutical companys commercials on national TV?

Matt Laslo's avatar
Ask a Pol uaps
Ask a Pol uaps
Rep. Andre Carson on UAP / drone investigations: "our adversaries are watching and listening"
0:00
-2:53
Joseph Felser's avatar

Carson referred to the SCIF (on “drones”?) and the “open hearings.” Was that a reference to the UAP hearings? So is he tacitly amalgamating “drones” with UAP? That would be big.

Hesitate answering this, but yeah -- the terms are used interchangeably on Capitol Hill.

As in: When I say 'drones' I'm saying 'uaps' 50-70% of the time, cause most lawmakers won't discuss 'uaps' even as they have all the thoughts on the unknown objects they refer to as 'drones'...

1 Like
1 Reply
Jan 15
at
12:54 AM