That isn’t the problem. The problem is these are laws.

At the end of the day the delegates have to vote and certify the candidate. These are state laws and some national ones too. If you were a 28 year old union leader who had a chance to choose the next president would you give that power up? Your union would hate you if you did.

What you are asking for is to not to be polarizing. I agree completely with that. But the delegates will want to know where you stand on Israel or policing or Israel or nato. You can’t avoid a debate about the policy. Otherwise what is the point? 7 people get up and give speeches and draw no distinction between each other is useful how? They need to stake positions that they defend so that the delegates can choose. If you’re not going to have realistic debates what’s the point of going through the charade…just choose Kamala and move on because if the above happens and you don’t choose Kamala people are going to cry foul.