The elevation of Pope Leo XIV is a profound and historic occasion. Like so many around the world, I am praying for him and wishing him and the Church well as his papacy begins.
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
So let me get this straight, we finally get an American pope, and some of the America first crowd is mad because he cares about the poor and immigrants. Am i missing something here?
•Said racism should be rejected and justice should be sought
MAGA’s worst nightmare!
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
sometimes i wonder how many versions of myself i’ve outgrown without even noticing. i look back at old photos and remember the thoughts i used to carry, the dreams i thought would save me. it’s strange how you can live inside yourself every day and still not realize you’re evolving. it’s only when you look back that you realize how far you’ve come, how many lives you’ve already lived in the same skin.
Grow your publication on Substack
With recommendations, referrals, and a powerful growth network, Substack creators spend less time on marketing and more time on their craft.
I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period
Grow Your Audience
Marketing isn’t all on your shoulders. More than 50% of all new free subscriptions and 25% of paid subscriptions come from within our network.
Helicopter makes emergency landing at Union County airport. The city dedicates a new 112-acre park. And MEVSD board member lobbies Ohio Senate on school funding
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
First, I want to congratulate you on your research, which is first rate.
Every thing you say here with regard to fight for free speech, attacking the old Dineage and her 77th husband and your support for an individual who is purely under accusation at this time are 100% on point. However, Russell Brand is without any doubt, an operative of the opposition. Along with Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson. I will direct you towards Miri Finch for a better description -
I read the Mira Af article you linked to. You're suggesting that we destroy people without facts. That's all she was doing, using guesses for slander. Unless Brand is a sociopath, that would mean that he enjoys the affect of this sex scandal on his family.
I don't like Andrew Tate, her equivocal example, but she leaves out that Tate sat in a prison in Romania which isn't a comfortable way to be controlled opposition.
Although every angle is possible, why not go with what we know first eg., the Media is known for blowing up interesting characters, inflating and deflating them. They do it cause it makes them money.
On an off note, thank fuck Murdoch is retired. Please send me an obituary.
I appreciate you taking the time to read my link Mike. Its Ok that we disagree on this. But to counter slightly your reply. I am not suggesting that we destroy people without facts. I watched the channel 4 documentary and found the "evidence" that he is guilty of anything unlawful to be severly lacking. The only thing he is guilty of is being a very pushy controlling narcisist with a sex addiction who some women, crazily thought they could control when, if they had any sence what so ever, they …
He's been open about his past and his efforts to be a better human. What proof is there that he's been dishonest? He does appear to have the "look at me" aspect of narcissism but without me knowing the degree, that doesn't mean that Narcissist defines him. The counterweight is that his empathy seems sincere. There is a difference between his over-the-top monologues versus him sanely and cleverly interviewing people.
But onto the meat which is you saying "There is copius amounts of evidence that …
I have no intention of arguing with or patronising you Mike, I have read your bio and I have nothing but respect for what you are doing in SA and wish you well. Being in the UK I have followed his career since the outset. For what its worth I used to find him mildly amusing, then completely annoying and peverted, then a few years back I noticed he had changed considerably and was even a keen listener of his podcast.
You clearly haven't seen the Mark Devlin film that I also linked, which is where…
I have read your "The Motive " article on Brand, and I also read Iain Davis' article. What I would say, on top of my initial response below, is that, you don't get to his (or Andrew Tate's) level of following unless the message you are pushing can be leveraged, we could argue all day over whether these hugely famous figures are knowingly controlled (I would argue that they know full well), but the fact that they have not been memory holed out of existence should tell you all you need to know. M…
I don't consider that to be an article and stated it was half arsed opinion. My data was running out and I posted hastily, but later linked to solid articles by others (as I will link to this page).
I'm not fruitlessly arguing. I'm trying to get you to prove your argument.
First, address the facts in Starky's article. Agree or disagree, with reason why. Separate fact from opinion.
Then list facts why Brand is controlled opposition.
1.
2.
3. etc.
I'm not a friend of Brand, and have no reason to support…