Are any of you Substack creators able to create a new video post right now, or does it default to an audio post (asking for an audio file) when you try to do that?
I’m going to say something that shouldn’t be controversial but will be. If you are a Christian, you can support border control and immigration being legal vs illegal. You CANNOT celebrate deportations and get off on the cruelty, and be a real Christ follower. Period
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
I support AOC’s bill to end stock trading in Congress. It is true “insider trading”.
Do you?
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Republican senator Dave McCormick condemns the arson against Governor Shapiro’s home: “We must call out the radical rhetoric and political violence that we have all witnessed over the course of this decade.”
World-class writing
The best stories, ideas, and culture right at your fingertips.
Trump has taken the most powerful country in the world, with the greatest alliances, and the strongest economy, and flushed it down the toilet based on his understanding of politics in 1984 and trade deficits.
The greatest self shot to the nut sack in history
Grow your publication on Substack
With recommendations, referrals, and a powerful growth network, Substack creators spend less time on marketing and more time on their craft.
About once a week, I start to hate writing. Or I may find myself depressed and want to give up.
Then I eat something or take a nap.
Magically, I feel like a new person.
And I also want to write again!
Perhaps I was just hangry or tired.
I bet maybe you can relate ;)
You made it, you own it
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
Fair is fair, as they say. The inverse of that postulate is no less true. People and states who have been more successful should not be propping up those which have failed to “take care of business” or of their responsibilities. Wait – that sounds strangely familiar. Yes, that’s what I thought. That is essentially the party line of the conservatives/Republicans/reactionaries. Hard-working people should not have to give up the fruits of their labor and their property or wealth to take care of those people who have squandered their resources.
The sentiment is admirable. But fairness in this case is a little too complex for most people for anything to happen in the way of rectifying the situation in the foreseeable future. First of all, there are also lots of powerful people and interests in Blue states working at cross purposes to those who support liberal/progressive/sane policies and working in league with the backward looking Red state officials and power brokers. Secondly, media owners have no interest in allowing the merits and details of such a change to ever reach the public. Thirdly, the big players will go to any lengths and spend millions on right-wing propaganda and talking points to quash this proposal, while the public will have more interest in football games and myriad other entertaining diversions.
This is not to say that this and other ideas should not be pursued with vigor and determination. Every attempt to draw attention to wrongs and systemic errors should be tried, and giving up without a fight is not an option. It doesn’t take a genius to see what has been happening for a very long time and changes do come eventually once momentum builds. Being a wet blanket is no fun at all. However, I’m afraid that our only hope is a series of positive events and major losses on the right with a huge shift in public attitudes and awareness in the next few years and decades. Right now, it’s a coin toss unless you truly are a cynic.
You said "I’m afraid that our only hope is a series of positive events and major losses on the right with a huge shift in public attitudes and awareness in the next few years and decades."
I've just been reading a book, "Brighter: Optimism, Progress, and the Future of Environmentalism" by Adam Dorr. --very factually based, and goes far beyond "merely" saving the environment, and the time-frame "in the next few years and decades" is applicable. It appears that your hope for a series of pos…