The NYT study found 54% of readers preferred AI writing over human writing.

Everyone's drawing the wrong conclusion.

It didn't test AI vs. good human writing. It tested AI vs. average human writing. Unassisted. Unedited. Raw first-draft prose against a machine trained on the best writing in human history.

Of course AI won that fight.

The question nobody asked: what happens when a human who gives a shit collaborates with AI?

I wrote about why that 54% is actually the best news solo creators have gotten all year. ↓