I optimistically disagree: the natural world and the canon will always preserve our longing for great art. We are the same people fundamentally as our ancestors were. Humanity does not ultimately want 2:2 level essays and flat images. I predict an increasing turn away from the machine and captured institutions back to real conversation, real life, passion, romance, seduction, flesh, ambiguity and complexity. It’s already happening. Zoomers raised on a steady diet of computer (school, parents, surveillance, boredom, monitoring, prison) associate online not with cyberutopian avatars and freeplay but with depression and isolation.
The danger is not that AI will replace art. The danger is that due to AI, in tandem with the incentives of ad-based free platforms, our own brains will have come too enshittified to recognize great art, and the incentives to create it will have disappeared.
I don’t think this is a forgone conclusion. But it is the direction we’re heading.
Mar 17
at
5:55 PM
Log in or sign up
Join the most interesting and insightful discussions.