Did anyone notice how Greg not so subliminally suggests there is a virus in his write-up in spite of seeming to promote there is no virus. Look at the opening 3 sentences, my comments in brackets:

No one has ever isolated a virus [meaning a virus exits it’s just not isolated?]. This is admitted by modern science who claim it’s impossible. So instead, they mix it [“it” means a virus?] with a soup of other genetic materials, run it [“it” means a virus?] through a computer and create what is known as a consensus genome [“genome” implying a virus? Why not just call it what it really is, a letter sequence?].