If you’re trying to figure out why the youth are becoming Catholic, I recommend the radical strategy of seeing how they explain their own decision. And there could be no better place to start than
You always own your intellectual property, mailing list, and subscriber payments. With full editorial control and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in.
I just got back from teaching my class and every word of it this is true, this is no exaggeration. He is writing from an American university but it is exactly the same in Canada.
Literally speaking, no. The Romans performed the crucifixion. But the crowd and the leaders in Jerusalem were clearly baying for blood. Pilate gave them what they wanted, despite his better instincts (and those of his wife. Let that be a lesson to you, gentlemen).
The argument that “Jerusalem crowd + leaders ≠ Jews as a whole” is so obvious as to need no elaboration.
One of the less considered implications of “thuh jooz diddit” is that Pilate escapes deserved blame. He tried to wash his hands and blame it all on the tough crowd, but the fact remains: he had the authority* to pass judgement, and he imposed the capital sentence on Jesus. If he was just a victim of a dastardly plot by (((locals))), he would escape the opprobrium that he deserves.
* authority given, as Jesus pointed out, from above
I was recently informed that it is antisemitic to believe that the Jews killed Christ*. When I pushed back, saying it should be a fairly non-controversial reading of the Gospels, I was told that it is “a common antisemitic trope”, as if that answered everything.